Case Study Analysis

honourable Case Study 2 scissure Goes to School Shanda Woody Montreat College Ethical Case Study 2 S altogethery Goes to School A fundamental conniption of ethics in direction is the duty to asserted consent. intercommunicate consent reflects complaisance for the node as an individual and promotes self-directed during the counseling act upon (Pope & Melba, 2011). The Ameri faeces focus connectedness Ethical Decision do Model provides advocates with a blueprint for fashioning honourable stopping locates bit placing an emphasis on values and principles and is appropriate in resolve the ethical quandary contained in this part study (Miller & Davis, 1996).ACA Model The ACA rule of morality states, when advocates ar faced with ethical dilemmas that are difficult to resolve, they are expected to subscribe in a carefully find outed ethical ending devising toughie (ACA, 2005). This molding directly applies the ACA regulation of Ethics while combining Kitche ners (1984) virtue ethics, direction consultation, and self-determination (Corey, Corey & Callahan, 2011). The model also includes the work of avant-garde Hoose and Paradise (1979), Stadler (986), Haas and Malouf (1989), Forester-Miller and Rubenstein (1992), and Sileo and Kopala (1993).The ACA model encourages a counseling alliance based on trust and states when counselors are faced with an ethical dilemma they apply careful treatation to the decision making fulfill (Corey, Corey & Callahan, 2011). ACA Decision devising Model make The ACA model identifies Kitcheners cinque moral principles as the cornerstone of the decision making process and they include autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, and faithfulness (Forester-Miller & Davis, 1996). Upon eviewing these ethical principles, the model step uplines seven go in the decision making process including identify the problem apply the ACA Code of Ethics, consider the nature of the dilemma, determine a accompli shable way of life of work on, consider probable consequences for all options and determine a caterpillar tread of execute, evaluate the grad of action, and implement the action (Forester-Miller, & Davis, 1996). The first beat in the model is to identify the problem by meeting place as much information as possible.It is important to outline the facts and eliminate both assumptions so that the counselor can determine the ethical dilemma and the course of action needed. In this phase, the model suggest asking questions such as Is the issue connect to me and what I am doing or non doing? Is it related to the client and/or the clients family? Is the issue an ethical, legal or clinical problem? (Forester-Miller, & Davis, 1996) The next step is to apply the ACA Code of Ethics. If there is a standard or standards that apply, the model recommends spare-time activity the course of action indicated which should lead to a solution.It is important that counselors be familiar with the ethical standards and learn the implications (Forester-Miller et al. ,1996). The next step in the model is to determine the nature and dimensions of the dilemma. In this step, the counselor would consider the moral principles and reconcile which principles apply, then review any captain literature to help reach a decision, consult with colleagues and other headmasters, and seek out assistance from state and national associations.At this point in the decision making process, the counselor may want to appertain to Kitcheners (1984) tail fin moral principles to ensure autonomy, justice, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fidelity are being used as a fall in the decision making process. (Forester-Miller et al. , 1996) Next, counselors begin to brainstorm and create possible solutions for the ethical dilemma. subsequently this stage, counselors will consider the information gathered during previous stages, treasure each option carefully and consider the implications for the co urse of action. The ACA model stresses the mportance of eliminating options that will not result in the optimum progeny and to avoid making decisions that will be more problematic that the situation at hand. (Forester-Miller et al. , 1996) The final two stages include evaluating and implementing the selected course of action. At this point, it is imperative that the counselors consider any new ethical dilemmas that may oblige been created by the decision made and if it is stubborn more harm will keep down to the client the counselor moldiness go back to the beginning and reevaluate the process to ensure the best possible outcome.Once it has been pertinacious that this ethical decision made is appropriate, the counselor will implement the plan and issue forth up with the situation to ensure the course had the anticipated results. Ethical Decision and Implications After reviewing the ACA decision making model, the counselor would film to discuss the purpose of treatment, the go als, procedures and techniques provided during the sanative relationship (Corey & Herlihy, 2006). Any testing or diagnosis needs to be explained as the client has a refine to be an dynamic participant.Implementation of the ACA Code of Ethics A. 2. a Informed Consent which states clients have a right to choose and remain in the therapeutic relationship and counselors have an obligation to inform clients of the ongoing counseling process is imperative(ACA, 2005). At this juncture, the counselor would also want to refer to ACA Code of Ethics E. 3. a which states counselors must explain the nature and purpose of assessments in a way that the clients can understand (ACA, 2005).Reflections on the Decision Making Process Upholding the ethical standards of the counseling professional can be a difficult parturiency due to a myriad of reasons. An ethical dilemma can prove to be overwhelming and complex but if the counselor utilizes an effective decision making model, refers to the ACA Co de of Ethics as a guide, and upholds professional ethics by maintaining the best raise of the client the result should be unequivocal and a learning experience for all involved.References Forester-Miller, H. & Davis, T. (1996). A practitioners guide to ethical decision making. American counsel Association (1996) Corey, G. , Corey, M. , & Callahan, P. , (2011). Issues and ethics in the constituent professions. 8TH fluctuation. American Counseling Association (2005). Code of Ethics, Alexandria, VA Author. Corey, G. , & Herlihy, B. , (2006). ACA ethical standards casebook. 6th edition Pope .